Water Politics in U.S. Southeast: Beware of the Inevitable Deluge

Associated Press is reporting that Federal biologists signed off on a plan to reduce the flow of water from Lake Lanier, the main water source for Atlanta and the focal point of a three-state water fight as the Southeast contends with a historic drought.  However, as the article notes, the issues is still under strong debate:

“…Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue has criticized the federal government for continuing what he calls excessive water releases from north Georgia reservoirs even as the drought threatens Atlanta’s water supplies.

The fast-growing Atlanta region relies on the lake for drinking water. But power plants in Florida and Alabama depend on healthy river flows, as do farms, commercial fisheries, industrial users and municipalities….

…Florida and Alabama have balked at Georgia‘s effort to keep more water, arguing that its demands were unreasonable and that reducing the flows downstream could cripple their economies….

…Earlier this month, at a three-state water meeting in Washington, the Army Corps of Engineers said it wanted to temporarily cut the flow of water to Florida by 16 percent until the drought breaks, but needed the approval of Fish and Wildlife.

It made for a temporary truce in a tug-of-war that has pitted the states against each other for the better part of two decades, but has intensified as record drought descended over much of the region.

But Florida last week backed away from the agreement, saying the reductions could cause a “catastrophic collapse of the oyster industry” and “displace the entire economy” in the Florida Panhandle.

Meanwhile in Washington, a panel of federal appeals judges questioned whether the Army Corps of Engineers has the authority to divvy up portions of the lake for drinking water instead of producing power.

In one of seven active lawsuits in the water wars, attorneys for all three states argued before the panel over a 2003 settlement in which the Corps agreed to allow Georgia to use nearly 25 percent of Lanier for drinking water storage.

The long-term agreement, which has not yet been implemented, is a linchpin of Georgia’s water plans for the coming decades. Currently, the state gets water from Lanier under smaller, short-term contracts.

Florida and Alabama have fought the agreement, arguing that Lanier was built to produce hydropower and that under federal law only Congress has authority to significantly alter the functions of federal reservoirs….”

We have covered this example of water politics in an earlier post and, undoubtedly, will do so in future posts.  This is but one small example of the state vs. state and city vs. state tussles that are going to mark the management of freshwater resources for the next several decades.

This entry was posted on Friday, November 16th, 2007 at 1:35 pm and is filed under United States.  You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.  Both comments and pings are currently closed. 

Comments are closed.

© 2024 Water Politics LLC .  'Water Politics', 'Water. Politics. Life', and 'Defining the Geopolitics of a Thirsty World' are service marks of Water Politics LLC.